Home Page  |  Vanderbilt courses taught  |  research  |  back to Department faculty  |  honors and awards
Lat 268: LUCRETIUS
    M, W, F: 2.10-3.00                                                                                                                                                        Dr. Daniel Solomon                       
Required texts: Bonnie Catto, Lucretius: Selections from De Rerum Natura (Bolchazy-Carducci, 1998)
    Lucretius: On the Nature of the Universe, tr. Ronald Latham, rev. John Godwin (Penguin, 1994)
           
Objectives:    1)  Linguistic: translation and grammatical/stylistic analysis of the pre-Virgilian epic poetry of Lucretius; 2) Philosophical: interpretation of Lucretius' adaptation of Epicurean doctrines in both physics and ethics;  3) Historical: contextualization of Lucretius in the socio-political crisis of Late Republican Rome.
    We will read all the passages in your Latin textbook except for #23, covering on average 40 verses per 50-minute session.  As you prepare your translations at home you must read not only the vocab notes but also the discussion questions and ANCIENT quotations as well.  These will help us in class to consider Lucretius as a Roman, as a poet, as a philosopher, and especially as a native speaker of Latin; to this end we will compare the poem to short counterexamples from Virgil and Horace in Latin, and from Epicurus and Philodemus in English.  Finally, we will devote some (though little) attention to scansion of dactylic hexameters, which will serve you in your reading of any Greco-Roman epic poet.
    Your goal in preparing your translation is to respect the grammatical structure of the Latin original, showing that you understand the cases of nouns, their agreement with their adjectives, the tenses and moods of verbs, and the identification of other parts of speech (especially adverbs).  Please note that there is not one single translation on the market that directly replicates the Latin (this is poetry after all!).  You may refer to your modern translation for difficult renderings of specific phrases, but copying entire clauses constitutes plagiarism. Therefore, your primary reference tool must be the abundance of notes provided by your own textbook.

Requirements:  
- Four Review Exams: translation, scansion, grammar identifications, and short commentary questions.

-One in-class presentation (5-7 minutes) on a few pages of modern scholarship on the day’s passage

- Two textual analyses: the first (c. 4 pages, due March 18) will show how c. 10 lines of your choice are representative of Lucretius’ style and content (i.e., poetic, philosophical, and/or social purpose); the second (c. 8 pages, due April 20) will compare a passage of Lucretius to a passage of any other ancient writer, showing what is distinctive about the style and content of Lucretius.

-Cumulative Final Exam: similar format to Review Exams, with a choice of two out of three passages. An alternate exam will be offered on Monday, May 2, noon.       

Course grade:

Class preparation and  contribution  10 %
First and Second Paper  5% and 10%
Review Exams  13 % each
Final Exam  23 %
    
Grading scale                       
89-87 = B+        86-83 = B        82-80 = B-        etc.         
               
       
               
Latin reading assignment: passage # (book and verses). 
Don’t forget to read the skipped verses in English.

Fri Jan 14
Mon Jan 17
Wed Jan 19
Fri Jan 21
Mon Jan 24
Wed Jan 26
Fri Jan 28
Mon Jan 31
Wed Feb 2
Fri Feb 4
Mon Feb 7
Wed Feb 9
Fri Feb 11
Mon Feb 14
Wed Feb 16
Fri Feb 18
Mon Feb 21
Wed Feb 23
Fri Feb 25
Mon Feb 28
Wed Mar 2
Fri Mar 4

Mar 5-13

Mon Mar 14
Wed Mar 16
Fri Mar 18
Mon Mar 21
Wed Mar 23
Fri Mar 25
Mon Mar 28
Wed Mar 30
Fri Apr 1
Mon Apr 4
Wed Apr 6
Fri Apr 8
Mon Apr 11
Wed Apr 13
Fri Apr 15
Mon Apr 18
Wed Apr 20
Fri Apr 22
Mon Apr 25
#1 (1.1-43)
##2, 3 (1.50-79)
##3, 4 , 5 (1.80-116, 146-58). 
##5, 6, 7 (1.159-73, 215-36, 250-64)
##8, 9 (1.265-84, 295-321).
##10, 11 (1.329-45, 358-69, 400-09)
##12, 13 (1. 419-32, 485-502, 528-30, 565-76).
#14 (1.921-50)
##15, 16 (1.958-59, 963-83, 1021-37)
BOOK 1 EXAM
#17 (2.1-33)
#18 (2.37-61)
#19 (2.95-99, 114-22, 142-64)
##20, 21 (2.216-24, 251-68, 289-93, 308-22)
##21, 22 (2.323-35, 338-370)
##24, 25 (2.646-60, 991-1022)
##26, 27, 28 (2.1023-47, 1052-65, 1074-76, 1090-1104)
#29 (2.1150-52, 1157-74)
BOOK 2 EXAM
#30 (3.1-30)
##31, 32 (3.37-64, 94-97, 136-60)
##33, 34 (3.323-49, 830-42)

 SPRING BREAK

##35, 36 (3.894-903, 912-51)
##36, 37 (3.952-65, 978-1023)
Book 4 in English; paper 1 due
##38, 39 (4.1058-64, 1089-1101, 1120-40)
##39, 40 (4.1144-59, 1177-79, 1278-87)
BOOKS 3-4 EXAM
#41 (5.1-2, 6-27, 37-51)
##42, 43 (5.64-77, 195-234)
##44, 45 (5.235-46, 432-48)
##46, 47 (5.925-47, 953-72, 1011-23)
#48 (5.1028-29, 1041-45, 1050-51, 1056-61)
#49 (5.1161-68, 1183-89, 1194-1203)
#50 (5.1392-1404, 1412-35)
#51 (5.1448-57)
BOOK 5 EXAM
#52 (6.58-78)
Book 6 in English; paper 2 due
#53 (6.1090-97, 1138-44, 1256-58, 1267-86)
General review

Bibliography:

Amory, A.  “Obscura de Re Lucida Carmina : science and poetry in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura,” in Yale Classical Studies, 21 (1969): 145-168.
Anderson, W.  “Discontinuity in Lucretian symbolism,” in Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philogical Association, 91 (1960): 1-29.
Bailey, C. Commentary on Lucretius,  Oxford, 1947.
Brown, R. D.  Lucretius on Love and Sex, a Commentary on  De Rerum Natura, IV. 1030-1287, with Prolegomena, Text, and  Translation,  Leiden, 1987.
Classen, C. J.  “Poetry and Rhetoric in Lucretius,” in Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philogical Association 99 (1968): 77-118
Clay, D. Lucretius and Epicurus, Ithaca,1983.
Commager, H. S.  “Lucretius’ interpretation of the Plague,” in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 62 (1957): 105-118.
Conte, Gian Biagio, Genres and Readers (transl. G. W. Most), Baltimore, 1994, ch. 1.
Duban, J. M.  “Venus, Epicurus, and naturae species ratioque,” in American Journal of Philology, 103 (1982): 65-177.
Edwards, M. J.  “Aeternus Lepos: Venus, Lucretius and the Fear of Death,” in Greece & Rome 40 (1993): 68-78
Elder, J. P. "Lucretius 1.1-49" in Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philogical Association, 85 (1954): 88-120.
Fowler, D. P.  “Lucretius and Politics,” in M. Griffin and J. Barnes, edd., Philosophia Togata - Essays on Roman Philosophy and Society (vol. 2), Oxford, 1989: 20-150.
Furley, D.J.  pp. 1-17 of “Lucretius the Epicurean. On the history of man,” in Gigon, ed. Lucrèce (Fondation Hardt Entretiens, 24), Vandoeuvres-Geneva, 1978.   
Gale, M.  Myth and Poetry in Lucretius, London, 1994.
Hardie, P. H., pp. 193-200 of Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium, Oxford, 1986.
Jope, J.  “Lucretius’ Psychological Insight: His Notion of Unconscious Motivation,” in Phoenix 37 (1983): 224-238.
---------   "The Didactic Unity and the Emotional Import of Book 6 of de Rerum Natura," in Phoenix 43 (1989): 16-34.
Kenney, E. J.  “Doctus Lucretius,” in  Mnemosyne 23 (1970): 366-392
Mitsis, P.  “Didactic coercion: committing philosophy on the reader and reader autonomy in the De Rerum Natura,” in Mega Nepios [Materiali e discussioni, 31 (1993)]: 111-129.
Nussbaum, M. C.  The Therapy of Desire, Princeton, 1994, chh. 4-7.
Obbink, D.  Philodemus On Piety, Oxford, 1996.
Sedley, D. N. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge, 1998.
Segal, C. P. pp. 193-204 of "Poetic immortality and the fear of death" in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology,  92 (1989).
Solomon, D. "Lucretius’ Progressive Revelation of Nature in DRN, 1.149-502," in Phoenix, 58.3-4 (2004): 260-283.
Summers, Kirk “Lucretius and the Epicurean Tradition of Piety,” in Classical Philology, 90 (1995),  pp. 32-57, esp. 32-45 on 5.1161ff.
Snyder, J. M. Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ de Rerum Natura, Amsterdam, 1980.
Volk, K.  The Poetics of Latin Didactic. Oxford, 2002
West, D. The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius, Edinburgh, 1969.

 
Copyright Vanderbilt University